Fakturia vs Cortena

Cortena is a Fakturia alternative for teams that want AR in the same loop as payables, not a separate billing island.

Fakturia is a German subscription-management platform for recurring billing, dunning and DATEV-ready order-to-cash. Cortena starts from a different premise. You issue ZUGFeRD receivables from CRM and data sources, process payment advice, reconcile the bank, and run category-specific dunning next to payables. Here is a fair, factual comparison so you can decide which one fits.

Book a demo

Takes 30 seconds. We tailor the demo to what you send.

Jump to the comparison table

Comparison written and reviewed October 2026. Where a Fakturia detail is not publicly documented, we mark it "varies" rather than guess.

Fair play

What Fakturia does well.

We are not here to run Fakturia down. It is a serious subscription billing product for German recurring businesses. Credit where it is due.

Order-to-cash for Abo businesses

Contracts, recurring invoices, upgrades, cancellations and self-service sit in one billing-focused stack built for subscription companies.

Native ZUGFeRD, XRechnung and DATEV

E-invoice formats and DATEV export are first-class, including passive Rechnungsabgrenzung on the accounting path.

Automated Mahnwesen and payment providers

Dunning, SEPA and card providers, plus API and MCP hooks, cover the classic SaaS collection loop without inventing tooling from scratch.

If a dedicated subscription billing platform is your main need, Fakturia may be the right fit. The rest of this page is for teams that want AR inside the same controlled workspace as payables.

The real difference

Subscription billing alone does not clear the books with payables.

Fakturia-class tools own the Abo commercial loop. Cortena is the finance operator: issue from CRM and feeders, clear cash with payment advice and bank lines, chase by customer class, and post booking-ready entries next to AP.

Subscriptions inside a full AR workspace.

Cortena subscriptions support recurring, one-time and usage lines, then enter the same AR workflow as one-off invoices. Issue becomes ZUGFeRD EN 16931. You approve before anything posts.

  • Recurring, one-time and usage subscription lines
  • ZUGFeRD EN 16931 on issue
  • CRM and feeder-sourced customers and products
Hetzner Online GmbH Issued
Plan6837
PeriodKST 4200
StatusBU 9
✦ Why this bill run

Subscription Pro monthly · period 1–31 Oct. Prepaid span covered. Draft entered AR workflow at subscription_invoice, readiness passed, ZUGFeRD pending on issue.

Subscription billing that lands in the same AR workflow as one-off invoices.

Payment advice and bank match beside payables.

Instead of stopping at billing events, Cortena processes payment advice, matches bank lines to open items, and runs category-specific dunning with the same control model as AP.

  • Payment advice against open items
  • Bank reconciliation and write-back
  • Dunning by customer category or class
ar-briefing.txt · Entity: Velten SaaS GmbH
Bill Pro and Growth on the 1st. Usage lines close on the last day of month.
Enterprise dunning +3 / +14. Self-serve SMB +7 / +21. Never escalate without finance approval.
Match payment advice before bank clear. Ask Sophie on short-pays over €100.
An AR briefing in plain language, not only a billing rules engine.
Fakturia vs Cortena

The honest comparison.

Row by row, on the dimensions that actually change your week. Cortena facts are what we ship today. Fakturia facts we keep to what is publicly documented, and mark the rest "varies".

DimensionFakturiaCortena
Core approachGerman subscription billing and order-to-cash platformAR operator next to payables: issue, clear, chase, post
How invoices are producedRecurring contracts, upgrades, API-driven billing runsSubscriptions plus CRM/feeder compose, ZUGFeRD on issue
Reminders and collectionsAutomated Mahnwesen and payment-provider retriesCategory-specific dunning with approval control
Path to DATEV / ledgersDATEV export including Rechnungsabgrenzung pathsBooking-ready handoff to DATEV, Exact Online, Twinfield
Multi-entityVariesMulti-entity with shared workspace next to payables
OnboardingVariesWhite-glove setup, free, live in 15 days
Pricing modelPlan-based subscription billing pricingTransparent, on request, no charge for onboarding

Fakturia is a capable product and its exact behaviour depends on plan and configuration. Where we could not verify a detail from public sources, we wrote "varies" instead of inventing one. If any fact here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.

An honest recommendation

Who should pick which.

Pick Fakturia if

Fakturia is the better fit when

  • Your primary need is a dedicated German subscription billing platform.
  • Self-service portal, contract lifecycle and payment-provider billing are central.
  • You do not need payables, payment advice and AR in the same operator workspace.
Pick Cortena if

Cortena is the better fit when

  • You want subscriptions inside AR next to payables, not a separate billing island.
  • Payment advice, bank match and category dunning matter as much as recurring issue.
  • You need ZUGFeRD on issue and booking-ready handoff to DATEV, Exact or Twinfield.
  • You want free white-glove setup with one control model for AP and AR.
Switching

Moving from Fakturia takes about 15 days.

There is no ledger migration to dread. Your books stay where they are. We connect CRM and product data, recreate subscription schedules in Cortena, and run issue, payment advice and dunning alongside you until the loop earns your trust.

See multi-entity onboarding
  1. 1Connect and map, day 1Link CRM or billing sources and map customers, products and plans. No project team required.
  2. 2Bill and clear side by sideCortena runs subscription drafts into the AR workflow, issues ZUGFeRD, and matches payment advice with you reviewing exceptions.
  3. 3Go live in 15 daysCategory dunning and booking-ready export run on your rules into DATEV, Exact Online or Twinfield.
Fakturia vs Cortena

Questions people ask before switching.

  1. Yes, for teams that want subscription AR inside the same operator as payables. Fakturia remains strong as a dedicated German billing platform. Cortena issues ZUGFeRD receivables, clears cash with payment advice and bank match, and posts booking-ready entries next to AP.

  2. Cortena focuses on finance operations: issue, clear, chase and post. A full customer self-service portal for upgrades and cancellations is a Fakturia strength. If that portal is your primary need, Fakturia may fit better.

  3. Yes. Cortena subscriptions support recurring, one-time and usage lines, with scheduled billing into the AR workflow and ZUGFeRD on issue.

  4. Cortena hands booking-ready receivables into DATEV, Exact Online or Twinfield on the same controlled path as payables. Fakturia offers native DATEV export including Rechnungsabgrenzung paths. Cortena works GoBD-aligned.

  5. We have tried hard to keep it fair. We credit what Fakturia does well and, where a detail is not publicly documented, we mark it "varies" rather than invent a fact. If anything here is wrong or out of date, tell us and we will fix it.

  6. Send us a message

    We'll get back to you within one business day.

See the difference on your own subscriptions.

Book a demo and bring a week of real AR. We will walk subscription issue, ZUGFeRD, payment advice and category dunning so you can compare for yourself.

Book a demo

Takes 30 seconds. We tailor the demo to what you send.